<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomandalissa.com/archives/707/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomandalissa.com/archives/707</link>
	<description>beginning of a lifelong fling</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.tomandalissa.com/archives/707#comment-232666</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomandalissa.com/?p=707#comment-232666</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think Brideshead Revisited is better than Atonement by at least 300% and I mean that quite seriously, it's understated and outstanding, but in all reality the studio is probably releasing the film so early (Oscar contenders generally release late in the fall) because it thinks another of their films has a better shot at winning them a statuette, and that's a shame, because Brideshead is so good, but difficult, dramatic stories like this only get seen if they win awards, so boo on Miramax.  And go see this film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think Brideshead Revisited is better than Atonement by at least 300% and I mean that quite seriously, it&#8217;s understated and outstanding, but in all reality the studio is probably releasing the film so early (Oscar contenders generally release late in the fall) because it thinks another of their films has a better shot at winning them a statuette, and that&#8217;s a shame, because Brideshead is so good, but difficult, dramatic stories like this only get seen if they win awards, so boo on Miramax.  And go see this film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
